In
February 2003 I was working as editor of the Cambridge Chronicle in its namesake city outside Boston. America was a different place back then. We
were still reeling from the Sept. 11 attacks and the government, led at least
figuratively by George W. Bush, was milking the public’s terror for all the mandate
it could muster. In less than a month
we’d have boots on the ground in Iraq with a long occupation ahead.
On
Feb. 19th, I wrote an editorial for the paper calling for George
W.’s impeachment and removal from office.
(This
is the only copy I can find of the thing; the typos and spelling mistakes
are not mine.) Bush stayed in office, the war went ahead, and I got written up
for insubordination – likely because, in those days, the Chronicle was owned by the Right-leaning Boston Herald. In the editorial I talked about the Constitution, but
the refrain running through my head was: He’s
making us worse.
And
he did. Bush made us scared and paranoid and more likely to bite. He made us
unreasonable and bombastic. Under Bush, America grew superstitious, xenophobic
and unwilling to sacrifice. In a time of war and want, Bush encouraged us to go
shopping. He modeled frugality by making America live outside its means and
borrow money from China to pay for its aggression. Bush turned us into a bully,
setting the precedent of invading sovereign countries simply because we don’t
like the leadership. In eight years we forgot how to delay our gratification
Obama
has made us better. As the Republicans have made asses of themselves talking
about rape and trying to roll abortion and contraceptive rights back to the
1950s, Obama has worked to protect choice, signed equal-pay-for-equal-work into
law, ended Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, protected the children of illegal immigrants,
defended the right of marriage for everyone, and made the government more
transparent. I would have preferred a
single-payer healthcare system to the Frankenpolicy that became Obamacare, but
Obamacare is better than what we had. We’re trying to take care of more people
now and, at least, admitting that we have some responsibility for the
well-being of our fellows. By investing in green energy, Obama has at least
made the attempt to use our dollars to vote for a better future. This is where
we want to go – smarter kids and cleaner air – not some Dickensonian
future where the air is full of coal ash and only the wealthy prosper.
The Obama
administration has broadened the umbrella of the Constitution and the Bill of
Rights so that more people are out of the rain. These people are better off
than they were before, and we’re a better society for making sure they are
protected.
Forget
the economy. The whole idea that government controls
the economy is a fallacy. It has some control over the things around it, but
there are too many people, like me, who buy their morning coffee at Starbucks
rather than from a Mom-and-Pop shop, and too much of the money is in the hands
of too few. The economy rises, and it falls. It’s a cycle. We fell far; it's
going to take time to recover. I believe Obama's plan has a better chance at
aiding slow, steady growth. But even if it didn’t, even if the other guy had a
big green GO button that would instantly give us unparalleled economic growth
and jobs for all, I would vote for better rather than bucks. I would live
jobless in my car before I helped to usher in leadership that wanted to reverse
the progress we've made on becoming a better, more enlightened society.
And that’s why I am voting for Barack Obama on Nov.
6 (and I still think Bush should have been impeached).
Well said. It makes me crazy when presidential candiates talk about the economy. They have zero influence over it. If anything, congress controls more of the economy than the executive branch ever could. But at the end of the day, it's not politicians who decide the money thing. Like you, I'm much more interested in a president's foreign policy. That *is* the president's job.
ReplyDeleteYeah, there's not much in the Constitution about the "right to a booming economy."
DeleteI'm voting for Obama too - so many reasons. But the biggest one is this: how can I work in education and not favor the candidate who cares about the poor? Great post Rob.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Suz. I've always thought that the true measure of a nation is how it treats the least powerful of its citizens. We produce four times as much food as we eat, and we spent nearly $2 billion on this presidential race. We could be doing better.
ReplyDelete